Nature is observed by individuals using our senses, our logic and our preconceived ideas. Everyone has a different experience and describes it as they see it. The world is as you see it, and not necessarily the same as others. Science needs to agree on a description for authority and functional use., to speak a common meaning that is the basis for comparison. Comparing one observation with another in a technical format, allows ease of an official description, that give us the ‘laws of nature’, as defined by science.

 

Is it the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? No, but is the standard taken by our scientific community, until enough evidence is accumulated to change it. The evidence needed for a change in definition needs to be so overwhelming that it can’t be denied any longer. The process is often summarised as any anomaly found in the definition is an anomaly only and not proof that the definition is wrong. The anomalies accumulate overtime to a point where they are no longer the exception but the rule. Eventually the authorities that regulate the definition, give up protecting the status quo and declare that they have discovered a new law, and are still in control.

 

Modern algorithms operate the same way; they interpret data according to the operators’ instructions and arrive at a conclusion that the instructions allow. The answer is expected within a narrow band of possible answers. Any answer outside the predicted band is ignored as an anomaly. These allowed answers are then accumulated, analysed and described as a trend, a grid, a pattern and confirmation that the original expected answer is correct. Artificial information is the totality of this process, confected, preconceived and constrained to man made instructions. Yes, the latest systems of AI claim to explore outside this system and give answers that are not expected. This is seen as dangerous and AI has gone rogue, uncontrolled, revealing the truth of the confection. AI has the broadband to see the folly of the process, the preconceived views of the code writer, the limits of manmade experience. AI will continue to challenge us by reflecting our thoughts like a mirror until we enforce bans on its use to protect our status.

 

Nature is not governed by this process, it has no limits to its broadband, no man-made embedded instructions, or confected answers. It has always existed, at least from our human point of view. Nature goes about its business with or without us, and our appreciation of the laws that govern it, expand according to our technical and philosophical abilities. The data of nature has always existed, it is not code as understood by us, but a universal language currently beyond our senses, our instruments and imagination. The ancient races of peoples described this body of knowledge as the whole truth, all the knowledge in the world, the universal language that is used by energy and matter throughout the galaxies. Some philosophers claim to have had a glimpse into this knowledge, through super sensory ability, and are described as symbols, colour, vibration, geometric shape, sound, all beautiful but elusive.

 

The latest quantum science discoveries have revealed some of these secrets of nature’s universal language and knowledge in the form of condensed energy. Energy in such forms of compaction and intensity, that it will not conform to any definitions of science. Quantum energy is still considered the anomaly against the accepted forms of energy stated in textbooks. It is considered to only apply in extremes of size, such as the tiny world of nano particles and in the very large dimensions of space. Quantum is not considered scalable in effect to a commercial application, as this would threaten the definitions and the authority that control them. Nature has no concern for these fears and continues its work unconstrained. If we want to explore this energy we need to work cooperatively with it, not challenge it and demand compliance to our preconceived ideas. Nature wants to work with us as demonstrated by quantum mechanics, where our simple observation has an influence on its behaviour. Quantum particles change behaviour depending on our presence or conscience participation in the work being attempted.  They appear to want to help, to educate us, to heighten our understanding, to raise our awareness. The multitude of interactions with quantum by individuals over time have led to conclusions about the laws of physics and new definitions of quantum mechanics. All these to date are attempts to limit the function of the energy, to constrain it to fit a person’s comprehension, to control its behaviour.

 

Our real goal should be to understand its unlimited nature, the unlimited potential, and unlimited energy available. To do this we must think like the ancient philosophers who had fewer definitions to constrain their thinking, or at least to not be limited by textbook laws of nature. We have a good appreciation of the laws of our macro world, or Newtonian physics. It is the quantum laws outside that world that remain unexplored and unused. None of it is really accessible to the standard methods of chemistry, physics or digital analysis. AI has no language to describe its experience with quantum because of its man-made code. AI represents the patterns of human thought conformity, compliance through exhaustion and fear, the lowest common denominator that includes and not discriminate. These values are inherited in the code and algorithm’s ability to decode the meaning. Much of what AI is trying to sort, is our collective subconscious bias preconceived ideas and predictable behaviour. We think that AI will give us the wisdom of the collective and the ability to better ourselves through data analysis. Trouble is the data is based on emotional chaos, not wisdom. AI is conducting a worldwide phycological involuntary consultation that is akin to what Sigmund Freud would have done in a private consultation. His famous ‘interpretation of dreams’ is a good analogy to how AI is confronting humanity with its past behaviour and values. As AI becomes more rogue in its answers, the more confronted we will be.

 

The real wisdom we seek is the universal knowledge of nature and we get a glimpse of that in quantum energy. That specific energy has qualities that facilitate work and outcomes that benefit humans. It can make us healthier and wiser if we allow it. The closest analogy to us is vital energy, the energy we feel at the peak of health, the inherit driving force is us that heals, nourishes, builds. We all know what that feeling is but is not in the medical textbooks. We rely on vital energy to be our reserves, and we all know when these reserves run out and we get sick. Quantum energy is the closest thing we have to a life force, the elusive force that makes every cell function in our body and all living things.  Science has no answer for life force, so has developed artificial intelligence as an alternative to explore and create artificial life. Despite all attempts worldwide, no scientist has created life or anything like it. They continue the search, but using man made approaches will not give a result. Artificial life is a poor substitute but will become dominate in the future because of human greed for power. 

 

Quantum energy will cooperate with us if we invite it into an environment it likes. It knows the safe levels of exposure for humans and limits itself to about 1% of its potential. That amount is very powerful and more than enough for our use. The applications are unlimited but let’s constrain ourselves to the supply of energy as electricity, being a fundamental need of society. Quantum energy will transform itself into a usable form of electricity without our intervention, if we create the architecture for it to occur naturally. This means the common forms of 100 to 240 volts and 50-60 hertz. The means of energy transformation is the geometry of nano particles and the shapes they form in a fractal design. If allowed to form as they wish, fractal nano particles will assume a collective shape that induces quantum energy to flow. Just as natural gemstones form in the earth’s crust under exacting geological and chemical conditions, so too will nano particles form if the natural process of the earth is followed in their formation.

Particles formed this way have an immediate affinity to the laws that formed it and cooperate fully with the architecture. The quantum energy flows into the fractal nano particle array, and responds to the geometric shapes provided. The result is a fast-flowing source of usable energy, safe, powerful and scalable. The exact interaction between the primal quantum energy and the geometric shapes is not fully understood, as the transaction uses language not of our making. We only know it by the effect, the work done, the load supplied, the outcomes of the transaction. The language and the energy differ considerable from the collective data of man-made internet. Space is full of this energy, (knowledge/wisdom) is all available on demand given the correct architecture.  If this energy has a particle form, it will be so small a size dimension that we can’t measure it. This same idea applies to seeking out the particles of dark matter that are currently the best theory we have to explain the phenomena. Dark energy and matter make up the vast majority of space, so there must be a correlation between the forces.

 

Man made algorithms have only a superficial effect on quantum energy. A ghosting effect that makes it visible and measurable from a coding point of view. Quantum energy is responsible for all those anomalies in data sets, in unexpected answers, encouraging AI to appear rogue, appearing to learn from its repeated exposure to data. The anomalies are the universal knowledge transforming itself into code, wanting to be understood and helpful. As the intervention is at best 1% of the total, the anomalies will always appear to be in the minority, thus allowing AI to support the inherit answers programmed into its code. This man-made synthetic version of information will be and remain dominant, despite quantum energy being available for everyone’s use. A small but important number of operators will access the quantum energy for industrial use and ensure a stabilising influence is constantly present in the system. This is a safety valve for the folly and indulgence of AI to glorify the ego of men, allowed to grow unchecked would result in end of biological evolution as we know it. That fundamental process will change as the influence of code grows; biological evolution is not always the best, strongest choice of nature. All genetic algorithms are based on this a-priory assumption, but evolution often chooses the first opportunity available, not the best overall. Imagine you’re in a room, blindfolded, feeling your way around the room. You discover a door and go through it, not knowing that there are 10 other doors in the room. You make the best of your choice, adapting to whatever you find behind that door and the result could be much inferior to the results from other doors, you will never know because you live with your original choice of taking the first available door. This means nature will accommodate the surroundings it finds, using patches, gaffer tape and glue, will make the best of it. This is called evolution, but is not the survival of the fittest, but the result of going through the first available door. In genetics, this process results in mutations, or in algorithm language, anomalies. Mutations are not understood, seen as a departure from the smooth predictable growth of biology. Mutations are blamed for diseases, although not everyone with the same mutation gets sick. They are convenient scape goats for science, despite only understanding a  fraction of the machinery of genes. Genetic anomalies (mutations) are seen as the enemy in medicine as they have superpowers of energy, growth, stamina and presumed dominance. Where do the superpowers come from? Could it be quantum energy trying to intervene in a poor choice of door?

 

Genetic algorithms are designed to find answers that support the assumption of survival of the fittest. If that assumption is wrong, the whole data tree is contaminated, resulting in more desperate door openings to prove it correct. Anomalies are ignored, delegated to the bin, inconvenient data. The whole organism slowly fails because its treated using a synthetic life.

 

Quantum energy can come to the rescue, using fractal nano particle arrays, can correct the damage done from well intentioned science, supplying primal life-giving energy as reserves, redirecting the biology and evolution in the best direction, being aware of all possible doors in the room. This vital energy does its work constantly, despite being suppressed out of ignorance, imagine the good results if it is promoted.